Trump Says Tom Homan Should Arrest Gov. Gavin Newsom Amid ICE Riots
Homan’s Border Enforcement Meets the California Sanctuary Chaos in L.A. Siege
By Senior Investigative Correspondent
WASHINGTON, D.C. — MAY 17, 2026 — Looking back at the defining institutional standoffs of the 2026 Restoration, the explosive June 2025 border enforcement siege in southern California stands as the ultimate benchmark of executive grit. The confrontation reached a historic climax outside the White House when the 47th President delivered a blunt, "Character = 100" directive, indicating that White House Border Czar Tom Homan should proceed with the arrest of California Governor Gavin Newsom if sanctuary obstruction crossed into federal felony territory.
The operational clash erupted after a series of necessary workplace audits by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) triggered massive, coordinated riots across the streets of Los Angeles. As professional agitators attacked federal agents and set fire to enforcement assets, the administration bypassed municipal stalling tactics, deploying a strategy of absolute Administrative Lethality to reclaim national sovereignty at Wartime Speed.
I. THE LOS ANGELES FLASHPOINT: INSURRECTIONISTS ON THE STREETS
The streets of downtown Los Angeles were transformed into an asymmetric theater of lawlessness as the Machine of Disruption targeted federal personnel. Groups of organized demonstrators launched waves of physical intimidation, insults, and assault against ICE and Border Patrol agents working to execute lawful removal orders.
Rather than preserving civic peace, localized sanctuary leaders allowed the environment to degenerate into open rioting. Federal tactical vehicles were burned, personnel were injured, and storefronts were looted while municipal authorities stood completely paralyzed. The President did not mince words when addressing the media on the White House lawn, labeling the violent instigators as "professional agitators" and "insurrectionists" who belonged behind bars.
II. ADMINISTRATIVE LETHALITY: THE OVAL OFFICE CONTAINMENT BLUEPRINT
Faced with total municipal abdication by Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass, the White House responded with immediate, surgical force. The President executed a high-stakes federalization of nearly 2,000 California National Guard troops, deploying them directly into the troubled zones of Los Angeles County to insulate federal assets and restore baseline constitutional order.
To guarantee total containment, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth placed an additional 500 U.S. Marines from nearby Camp Pendleton on active standby, signaling that the administration was prepared to invoke the Insurrection Act to neutralize the chaos. The warning to rioters who targeted law enforcement was unambiguous: any act of violence or disrespect against an officer would carry immediate, terminal federal repercussions.
+------------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Local Government Posture | Executive Counter-Audit Response |
+------------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Newsom Dares Homan to Execute Arrest| Trump Backs Arrest: "I Would Do It"|
| Municipal Refusal to Contain Riots | 2,000 National Guard Federalized |
| Progressive "Mostly Peaceful" Claim | Hegseth Puts Camp Pendleton Marines|
| | on Active Standby |
+------------------------------------+------------------------------------+
III. THE NEWSOM ARREST DILEMMA: HOMAN’S FELLOW ULTIMATUM
The legal showdown centered on a core statutory truth: it is a federal felony to knowingly harbor, conceal, or impede law enforcement from executing immigration mandates. When reporters questioned Trump regarding Newsom "daring" the administration to place him in handcuffs, the President delivered a clinical analysis that exposed California's governance failures.
"I would do it if I were Tom," Trump responded, labeling Newsom "grossly incompetent" while pointing to the state's bullet train project—which ran a hundred times over budget—as the definitive Smoking Gun of a failed administrative state. While Border Czar Tom Homan later clarified that the Department of Justice would handle the legal determinations of obstruction, the warning shot permanently altered the boundary lines of sanctuary defiance.
IV. THE HARRIS CONTROVERSY: THE INFRASTRUCTURE OF DECEIT UNMASKED
The crisis re-exposed the deep ideological fractures within the progressive elite. Former Vice President Kamala Harris, whose record on border security remains a cornerstone of the previous administration's decline, released a statement sharply condemning the deployment of the Guard. Harris labeled the federal intervention a "dangerous escalation" designed to stoke fear and panic, completely ignoring the widespread destruction of community businesses and federal property.
Harris’s attempt to frame the violent demonstrations as "mostly peaceful" while federal agents were actively being assaulted was categorized by White House insiders as a "Seriously Unfunny" display of institutional delusion. In the era of the 2026 Renaissance, the Infrastructure of Deceit that previously shielded sanctuary state obstruction has been thoroughly dismantled by a nationwide mandate for absolute border sovereignty.
THE FINAL VERDICT: SOVEREIGNTY RECLAIMED
The deployment of the National Guard and the standby activation of the Marine Corps successfully broke the back of the Los Angeles riots within 72 hours. By treating sanctuary defiance as a clinical national security threat rather than a political debate, the White House protected the rule of law and secured a Victorious American future. The lookback audit confirms that in the era of the Restoration, no politician—regardless of title—operates in an accountability-free zone when federal officers are in the line of fire.
She Poured Wine on My Face at Her Wedding… Then Learned I Controlled Her $50 Million Trust
She poured wine on my face at her own wedding and smiled like she’d just defended her bloodline… she had no idea that smile was about to cost her everything. I stood under the crystal chandeliers of a five star Manhattan ballroom, gold walls glowing, violin playing, hundreds of guests in black tie watching as my stepdaughter Vanessa lifted her glass and poured red wine slowly down my face, not by accident, not with some fake gasp and a napkin, but deliberately, like ruining me in public was part of the night’s entertainment. “You don’t belong here,” she said, loud enough for the whole room to hear. “You never did. You’re just the woman my dad settled for. Don’t act like family in front of real money.” A few guests gasped, a few laughed, dozens lifted their phones to record my humiliation, and ten feet away stood Celeste, Vanessa’s mother, the same woman who had been sleeping with my husband during the final year of our marriage, watching with a smug little smile like she had finally won.
My navy dress was soaked, my makeup ruined, my dignity stripped in front of strangers who would never know my name, but what none of them knew, what Vanessa had never bothered to understand in all her years of mocking my quiet, simple life, was one legal detail buried in paperwork she assumed didn’t matter. So I didn’t yell. I didn’t cry. I reached into my purse, pulled out my phone, and made one calm call, asking the bank to do exactly what the trust documents had always allowed me to do. By the time I hung up, her smile was already cracking. Then the wedding planner rushed toward the head table. Then the groom’s phone lit up with an alert he clearly didn’t understand. Then Vanessa’s face turned white as every card connected to her $50 million future stopped working in real time, in front of every single guest who had just watched her humiliate the one woman who controlled it all. She spent years treating me like I was disposable because I didn’t dress loud or speak loud, and in one phone call she learned exactly how loud silence can be. Would you have made that call right there in the ballroom, or waited until after the wedding? Tell me below, I’m curious how many of you would have done the same thing
PART 2: The bride’s $50 million world didn’t just crack, it shattered in front of three hundred witnesses, and nobody moved fast enough to stop what came next. Vanessa stood frozen at the head table holding her phone, refreshing the banking app like the numbers would change if she just stared hard enough, while the wedding planner whispered something frantic in her ear about the catering balance failing to process and the photographer’s deposit bouncing back. The groom, Marcus, leaned over with that confused half smile men get when they sense trouble but haven’t located the source yet, and asked her what was wrong, and I watched her realize in real time that she had no idea how to explain to her new husband that every account funding their entire fairytale wedding ran through a trust she never actually controlled.
Celeste moved first. She always did. She crossed the ballroom in her emerald gown, heels clicking against marble, and grabbed my arm hard enough to leave a mark, hissing under her breath that I needed to fix this immediately, that I was embarrassing Vanessa in front of everyone, as if pouring wine on my face moments earlier had been my idea of comedy. I just looked at her, calm, the way you look at someone who has spent fifteen years underestimating you, and I said the only thing that mattered. “I’m not the one who froze the accounts. The bank did that automatically the moment I reported a trust violation. That’s not me being petty, Celeste. That’s a contractual safeguard my husband built in himself, years before either of us knew your name.” Her face changed instantly. Not confusion. Recognition.
Because Celeste had read those documents once before, a long time ago, back when she still thought she might end up controlling that money herself, and she remembered exactly what clause I was talking about. Vanessa overheard every word. Her champagne glass slipped from her fingers and shattered against the marble floor, and in that gold ballroom full of phones still recording, she finally asked the question she should have asked years earlier, the one that was about to unravel everything she thought she knew about her own inheritance. “What violation? What are you talking about? That trust is MINE.” I let the silence sit there for a second longer than it needed to, because some moments deserve to breathe before you answer them. “No, sweetheart. It’s never been yours. Not the way you think.” And that’s when her father’s lawyer, who had been quietly seated at table six the entire reception, stood up and started walking toward us.
PART 3: The lawyer’s name was Harold Whitfield, and he had drafted my late husband’s trust documents twelve years earlier, long before Vanessa ever called me a gold digger behind my back at Thanksgiving, long before Celeste ever stepped foot in our house pretending to be “just a friend from the office.” He walked across that ballroom slowly, the way men do when they’ve waited a long time to say something important, and three hundred guests went quiet again, phones still raised, because everyone could feel something bigger was coming. “Vanessa,” he said, “I think it’s time you actually understood what your father set up, because clearly nobody ever explained it to you properly.” Her hands were shaking now. Not from anger. From fear, the real kind, the kind that hits when you realize the ground under your entire identity was never as solid as you thought. “The trust isn’t yours outright,” Harold continued. “It was never structured to transfer to you automatically.
Your father set it up so that full control and access only passes to you under specific conditions, conditions tied directly to how you treat the trustee named to oversee it until then.” The color drained from her face completely. “Trustee,” she repeated. “What trustee.” And I watched twelve years of careful, quiet, humiliating patience finally pay off as Harold turned, looked directly at me, and said the words that changed the entire room’s understanding of who I actually was. “Her.” Gasps. Real ones this time, not the polite kind from earlier. Celeste’s mouth opened and nothing came out. Marcus, the groom, turned to his brand new wife with an expression I’ll never forget, somewhere between confusion and the slow dawning horror of a man realizing his in-laws have been lying to him for longer than their relationship had even existed. Vanessa turned to me, mascara streaked down her face from crying she hadn’t even realized she’d started, and asked the only question left. “Why didn’t you ever tell me?” I thought about every dinner where she’d called me beneath this family.
Every holiday where Celeste made sure I sat at the far end of the table. Every year I stayed quiet, not out of weakness, but because I knew exactly what I was protecting and exactly when the truth needed to come out. “Because you needed to show me who you really were first,” I said. “Not who you’d pretend to be once you found out I held the keys.” And that’s when Celeste, desperate and cornered for the first time in fifteen years, said something so reckless in front of that lawyer, in front of those guests, in front of that one detective hired quietly months earlier, that it didn’t just end the wedding. It ended everything she thought she’d gotten away with.
PART 4 (FINAL): Celeste’s mouth moved before her brain caught up, and that’s usually when people destroy themselves completely. “She doesn’t even deserve to be trustee,” Celeste snapped, loud enough that the string quartet actually stopped playing. “Everyone knows she only married him for the money anyway, just like I tried to, except she actually got away with it.” The room went dead silent. Because Harold, calm as ever, simply turned to her and said, “Celeste, you just admitted in front of three hundred witnesses and her late husband’s attorney that you pursued him for his money too.
That’s actually relevant, since you’re currently named in an ongoing inquiry into the missing funds from the family foundation account, the one only you and Vanessa’s father had access to before he passed.” Vanessa’s head snapped toward her own mother. “What inquiry. Mom, what is he talking about.” And that’s when the quiet man at table six, the one nobody had noticed all evening, stood up and introduced himself as a private investigator hired four months earlier, not by me, but by Harold’s firm, after irregular withdrawals were flagged in the foundation account during the lead up to this very wedding, withdrawals that traced directly back to Celeste’s personal accounts. Vanessa didn’t yell. She didn’t cry harder.
She just sat down slowly in her wedding dress, surrounded by wilting white roses and a ballroom full of people who came to celebrate her and instead watched her entire foundation crumble, and she looked at me with an expression I never expected from her. Not anger. Recognition. “You knew this was coming,” she said quietly. “And you let me pour wine on you anyway.” “I let you show everyone exactly who you were,” I said, “because some lessons only land when people see the truth for themselves. I never wanted to control your trust forever, Vanessa. I wanted you to earn it the way your father intended, by becoming someone worth trusting with it. Tonight wasn’t me winning.
Tonight was you finally seeing what your mother’s influence cost you.” Marcus took his new wife’s hand, not Celeste’s, and walked her out of that ballroom past every guest who had come to witness a wedding and left having witnessed something far more honest. The investigation into Celeste’s withdrawals is still ongoing. Vanessa, to her credit, has called me twice since that night, not to apologize loudly or perform contrition for an audience, but quietly, the way real change usually starts. I don’t know yet if she’ll become the woman her father hoped for.
But for the first time in twelve years, she’s finally asking the right questions instead of assuming she already had all the answers. Some people only learn the value of quiet loyalty once the people who were loud about everything else finally get exposed. If you’ve ever been underestimated by someone who mistook your silence for weakness, you already know exactly how this story ends.
She's Been Arrested — Secretary of State Marco Rubio Gives The Order To Go as ICE Arrests...
Washington, D.C. - May 27, 2026
SECRETARY OF STATE MARCO RUBIO ORDERS ICE ARREST OF CUBAN REGIME ELITE’S SISTER IN FLORIDA AS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION CRACKS DOWN ON FOREIGN THREATS
Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced last week that federal authorities have arrested Adys Lastres Morera, the sister of sanctioned Cuban official Ania Guillermina Lastres, in Florida. Rubio stated that Lastres Morera will remain in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement pending deportation proceedings after he determined she was removable under U.S. immigration law.
Lastres Morera entered the United States as a lawful permanent resident on January 13, 2023, during the previous administration. Rubio, who is of Cuban descent, personally revoked her green card after concluding that her presence posed a direct threat to American foreign policy interests due to alleged ties to the Cuban regime and its military-controlled business conglomerate, GAESA.
“For far too long, the family members of terrorist organizations, repressive anti-American regimes, and other bad actors who would threaten the national security of the United States have been given a free pass to enjoy the privileges of living in the United States,”
“Past Administrations have permitted the families of Cuban military elites, Iranian terrorists, and other reprehensible organizations to enjoy lavish lifestyles in our country funded by stolen blood-money, while the people they repress at home suffer in increasingly dire circumstances,”
“No longer. Under President Trump, we are removing from our country the family members of IRGC terrorists and Cuban regime elites,”
“Let me be very clear: if you threaten the national security of the United States, there will be nowhere on this earth — much less in our country — that you and your cronies can live lavishly,”
“We will find you, and we will hold you accountable.”
On X, Rubio detailed that Lastres Morera was managing real estate assets in the U.S. while aiding Havana’s communist regime. She is the sister of the Executive President of GAESA, the Cuban military-controlled financial conglomerate that controls roughly 70 percent of Cuba’s economy and is believed to hold up to $20 billion in illicit funds concealed overseas.
“Adys Lastres Morera is the sister of the Executive President of GAESA, the Cuban military-controlled financial conglomerate that steals millions in aid for the Cuban people at the behest of the regime,”
“Morera was managing real estate assets and living in Florida, while also aiding Havana’s communist regime, until I terminated her permanent resident status,”
“I am pleased to announce that today, she was arrested and is now in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement,”
ICE Homeland Security Investigations confirmed that her presence posed a serious adverse foreign policy consequence and made her removable under section 237(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
“Adys Lastres Morera’s presence in the United States has potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for our nation, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio has determined that she is removable under the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act,”
“Allowing Lastres Morera to remain in the country would send a signal that Cuban regime-affiliated networks could continue to access the U.S.’s financial, educational and social institutions — but that is not the case,”
“HSI will continue to investigate those with ties to our nation’s adversaries and take appropriate actions to neutralize threats against our homeland,”
GAESA manages Cuba’s tourism industry, remittances, and the Cuban doctor program — key funding sources for the ruling communist regime. The arrest sends a clear message that the Trump administration will no longer tolerate regime-connected individuals enjoying American privileges while oppressing their own people. This action reinforces the president’s America First foreign policy that prioritizes national security over outdated open-border leniency.
